The internet used to be chock full of information (a good percentage of it either false or true but utterly useless), porn and pirated copyrighted material. Lately, though, I've noticed a sharp increase in yet another category, that of Al-Qaeda snuff videos. Not too long ago snuff movies were an Urban Legend. That is, no one had ever been able to prove that any movie had been shot for commercial purposes
AND included actual footage of a person being killed as an integral and planned part of the sequence of the film.
A few very corny films had been offered up as evidence, one of them being
Cannibal Holocaust, that such a genre really existed. The truth is, all those movies were the product of Special Effects. All the people who "died" in the films were tracked down later and proven to be still among us. Actors, all of them. Now, we have the Al-Qaeda sons of bitches filming themselves each time they behead one of their abducted victims. I propose we call these the first actual example of snuff films. Al-Qaeda's goals are simply a decrease of non-Islamic control and a subsequent increase of (their brand of) Islamic control over the world. We in the West are making the fatal flaw of judging these people by our own standards. While their goals do not classify as
commercial the way we would see it, I state that it is a direct equivalent.
I've been dumbfounded these past weeks at the way the misguided but very vocal Liberal minority here in the United States is still insisting that we should backtrack and appease these folks. I like the way the South Korean government responded to Al-Qaeda, basically stating that the beheading of their countryman would not affect their sending 3,000 troops to Iraq. It would have sent an even clearer message had they said that now, instead of 3,000, they'd be sending 6,000 troops. It's a sad statement on the cluelessness of people nowadays that some South Koreans are holding protests against sending those troops
AFTER news of the beheading of their countryman was released. I just can't understand why anyone would even consider caving in to a request from Al-Qaeda delivered in such a manner. It's the exact same scenario as when raising children. If your child comes to you requesting permission for something via a threat, you say no! Even if you had planned on granting permission beforehand. You cannot show weakness in these cases or you'll be a hostage to such demands forever after. See Spain.
Now, my countrymen here in the U.S., that's a whole 'nother can of worms... It has become fashionable (politically correct) to see everyone else's point of view and try to comply with it even if it comes as a detriment to our own interests. Another thing that has become fashionable is to spin every piece of news so it shows us and our government in the worst possible light.
Fact: Saddam tortured a hell of a lot more people in Al Ghraib (and many other facilities he had) than we could ever manage even if we're given the same amount of time he had.
It's not that we can't, it's that it's not in our nature. Now, I'm not using Saddam's actions to justify ours, but let's keep this in context. We took down someone who was systematically murdering and torturing his own people, and might I add, with nary an outcry from the same fools who are now howling for Rumsfeld's head for a few isolated incidents, and we are in the process of handing over autonomy to the Iraqi people.
Fact: Some Islamic Extremist assholes hijacked 4 airplanes 3 years ago and killed upwards of 3,000 people while using said airplanes as manned missiles.
We can go back and forth, looking for causes behind this, and how we pissed off the Arabs, and then go back and see how they pissed us off, and ultimately arrive at a couple of apes with bigger than normal braincases facing off with antelope jawbones in their hands, but at the end of the day 9/11 was still a cowardly attack by a terrorist group against unsuspecting civilians. The United States has a right to go after the people responsible for the attack, and anyone aiding, abetting or supporting these folks to make sure they are taken down. During these efforts we'll certainly make some mistakes and piss other people off, and we'll apologize for it. While Saddam did not directly participate in 9/11, he can certainly be classified as a supporter and it's good that we took him down. How do I know he's a supporter? Next fact, please...
Fact: Saddam Hussein paid money, 10 thousand U.S. dollars, if I recall correctly, to the families of every suicide bomber attacking Israel.
Now, I'm not a huge fan of Israel, but if that doesn't make Saddam a supporter of Islamic Extremist terrorists, then I don't know what does.
Fact: The Saudi Royal Family is involved to the hilt in all this Al-Qaeda stuff. Financing them and refusing to take them down when they most probably can.
Taking down Saddam was nice, but I think we need to roll through the region. My proposal? An ultimatum given to the Saudi Royal Family. Clean your act within a certain time or you're toast. If they don't comply, don't even waste troops, just nuke their sorry asses. The oilfields are nowhere near Riyadh, so who cares? I think it's time for us to take this whole thing to a new level and prove to the extremists that it's not in their best interests to mess with us.
I know my proposal will shock a lot of folks, but it's something that needs to be done. I hope Bush has the balls to at least give this some serious thought, and hopefully carry through with it once the inevitability sinks in.
Anyone reading this feel free to comment.